beta
Text
1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for a year and two months;
However, the above punishment shall be imposed for a period of three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant A, “2018 Highest 5369,” is the owner of the Cub car in C, and Defendant A and Defendant B are the siblings.
1. On June 17, 2018, Defendant A [Violation of Road Traffic Act (Non-licenseed Driving)] driven a Cub car without a driver’s license on the road near his domicile in Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D on June 17, 2018 to the road near his domicile in Dongjak-gu, Seoul, and 6, a Gu park, from about 8km to the road 52 miles.
2. The Defendants’ joint crimes [Violation of the Special Act on the Prevention of Fraud by Insurance] Defendant A, around 02:00 on June 17, 2018, driving the cub car in the above FF on the roads adjacent to the FF without a driver’s license, and was on the right side of the vehicle due to the failure to perform the duty of the cuber car in the front direction.
Defendant
A was anticipated that insurance money will not be paid due to driving without a license, A requested Defendant B, who is aware of the fact that he had received insurance money by receiving the accident as if he had driven by a pro-friendly Defendant B, and requested Defendant B to go to the scene of the accident with his awareness of the fact that he had not obtained a license. Defendant B, upon receiving the above proposal, instructed Defendant B to go to the scene of the accident after having arrived at the scene of the accident and after having arrived at the scene of the accident while driving the accident, and
After that, on June 19, 2018, Defendant A sent to the call center of Korea-U.S. Non-Life Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “victim”) (hereinafter “the victim company”) for the victim’s 16:47, and concealed the above accident on the 17th day of the same month, Defendant B received an accident as Defendant B was at the boundary of the fleet while driving the cub on the above F F on the road around 02:00 of the same month and was damaged by the front part of the above vehicle, and Defendant B received the accident as Defendant B was at the front part of the above vehicle, and Defendant B made a false statement to the purport that “it is true that he drives the cub in the name of the damaged company that confirmed whether the accident was not caused while driving the cub.”