logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2013.11.28 2013고단6566
권리행사방해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 21, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to five months of imprisonment by the Incheon District Court as a result of the obstruction of exercise of rights, and the judgment became final and conclusive on August 9, 2013, and on July 19, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of suspension of execution for six months of imprisonment with labor for the obstruction of exercise of rights in the Suwon District Court’s Ansan Branch, and the judgment became final and conclusive on July 27, 2013.

On December 14, 2011, the Defendant borrowed KRW 42,100,00 per month from the victim in a manner of equally repaying the principal and interest of KRW 901,371 per month from the victim to cover the vehicle price in purchasing Hansung Motor Co., Ltd. located in Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 935-42, and set up a collateral security on the said vehicle in the name of the victim.

On August 2, 2012, the Defendant arbitrarily transferred the said vehicle to C Co., Ltd.

Accordingly, the defendant concealed the above vehicle owned by the defendant, which is the object of the victim's right, and interfered with the victim's exercise of right.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. Complaint;

1. The new installment agreement, the register of automobiles;

1. Previous records: Criminal records, previous records and results of confirmation of each disposition, and the application of a copy of each decision and Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 323 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 323 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. The latter part of Article 37 and Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning concurrent crimes;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) that the defendant is led to the confession of the crime, the mistake of the defendant is divided, there is no record of criminal punishment except for the previous conviction in the judgment, the victim is flying the defendant's wife as agreed with the victim, equity between

arrow