logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원고등법원 2020.09.23 2020누11554
감봉처분취소
Text

The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except in the following cases. Thus, the reasoning of the judgment is cited by Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of

2. The 2nd line’s “(hereinafter referred to as the “instant Disposition”) shall be deleted.”

2. Parts of the 14th to 16th line shall be written by the following :

In August 2018, the Plaintiff filed an appeal against the above disposition with the Ministry of National Defense. On May 25, 2020, the said Review Committee rendered a decision to reduce the disciplinary action of the salary reduction for 3 months by the disciplinary action of the 17th month for the reason that it is difficult to readily conclude that the Plaintiff was hiding to the military unit to avoid punishment only after the accident, etc. (the above "the disciplinary action of the person who was reduced as of August 7, 2019" was included in the "No. 4" in the "No. 1 and No. 2" in the "No. 1 and No. 2 of the 3 last sentence, and the "No. 1 and No. 2" in the "No. 1 and No. 24445, May 25, 2020, and the "No. 45," and the plaintiff did not receive from the police officer or the police officer's return to the scene, and the plaintiff did not receive from the police officer or the police officer's return to the scene.

On November 2, 2018, at around 03:47, the local police station was present at the local police station traffic survey room, and the police officer in charge made a false statement to the police officer in charge, stating, “at the time of the accident, he/she was present at the time of the accident that he/she did not drink with drinking, but did not drink with drinking, and did not have drinking at the time of the accident that he/she was present at the police station after he/she was in charge of drinking.”

arrow