logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.05.25 2016나52875
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiffs' appeals against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. The grounds for appeal by the plaintiffs citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance, and the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance are justified even if each evidence submitted to the court of first instance was presented to this court.

Therefore, the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows: “Defendant C shall be held liable for nonperformance of obligations under the instant lease agreement, tort liability, or structure liability under Article 758 of the Civil Act” in the 13th sentence of the 5th sentence of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where “Defendant C shall be held liable for nonperformance of obligations under the instant lease agreement, tort liability, and preliminary liability for structures under Article 758 of the Civil Act.” Thus, it shall be cited pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the

(2) The Plaintiff’s appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices, on April 27, 2017, on the ground that the Plaintiff asserted the previous cause of claim by dividing the previous cause of claim into the primary cause of claim and the conjunctive cause of claim.

arrow