Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for two years and for three years, respectively.

However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant A.

Punishment of the crime

To the extent that it does not substantially disadvantage the defendants' exercise of their defense rights, the following facts charged are organized and criminal facts are recognized as follows:

Defendant

B is the representative director of E in charge of the settlement of accounts for the production and sale of food packaging materials, and the defendant A shall be the defendant B's wife and the above company's auditor.

From July 2007 to September 2, 2007, the Defendants conspired with the victim G and H in the office of the Seoul Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd. to obtain certification from the United States FDA, and agreed with the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry to make a settlement of the export packaging price purchased by the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, and the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry with the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry. Since the Agricultural Cooperatives entered into a contract to make all of the storage packaging paper as Korean company products, the Defendants can increase sales of more than 10 billion won per year, and it is possible to supply the packaging paper to the Agricultural Cooperatives because it is impossible to purchase raw materials due to financial shortage, and thus, the Defendants failed to supply the packaging paper to the Agricultural Cooperatives, so that products can be produced by purchasing them.”

However, in fact, there was no U.S. FDA certification, and there was no fact that it entered into an agreement with the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry with respect to product sales produced by the above company, or there was no fact that it entered into an agreement with the agricultural cooperative, and it is not possible to increase sales of more than 10 billion won a year because it was not possible to make mass production of packaging sites using raw materials developed in the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd due to financial shortage and lack of production facilities.

As above, the Defendants: (a) by deceiving the victims; (b) transferred the sum of KRW 180 million to the national bank account in the name of Defendant B from July 31, 2007 to January 24, 2008; and (c) transferred the sum of KRW 180 million from the victim G around October 11, 2007.