logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.01.12 2017가합23221
동산인도 청구
Text

1. The defendant shall deliver to the plaintiff movable property listed in the annexed sheet.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

3...

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiff is a juristic person engaged in new technology venture capital business, installment financing business, facility leasing business, etc., and the plaintiff and the defendant are as follows.

On July 18, 2017, the Busan District Court (2017dan1004), which entered into a facility lease contract as described in the subsection, was decided to commence rehabilitation procedures.

B. The Plaintiff and the Defendant concluded a “facility lease agreement” under which the Plaintiff, a financial company, acquired ownership of each movable property listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “each of the instant movable property”) and used it to the Defendant for a certain period, and the Defendant regularly received lease fees from the Defendant (hereinafter “facility lease agreement”) with regard to each of the instant movable property indicated in the separate sheet as follows:

(3) 2: 50,754,00 (5) lease amount: (1) 2: 50,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000: (2) 0:0,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000: (3:0,000,000,000,000,000:0,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00:0,000,000,00,000,00,00,00,00.

arrow