logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 포항지원 2020.06.11 2019고단1594
사기
Text

The imprisonment with prison labor for the accused shall be determined by one year and eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On September 22, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for six months for aiding and abetting the violation of the Fishery Resources Management Act in the Daegu District Court Port Branch on September 2, 2016, and the judgment became final and conclusive on September 30, 2016.

[Judgment of the court below] The defendant was the actual owner of B (9.77 tons and the shipment of Haak-gun in South and North Korea) and was ordered to suspend indictment on the same day as the date of the prosecution of this case C.

A. The name of the above B is the owner, and D is a person who actually operates the F with the whole business of the F in charge of building, etc. of fishing vessels in the Dai-gun, Daung-gun, Seoul.

The G Association provides loans to small-scale fishermen who intend to purchase fishing vessels or build vessels and engage in fisheries with the general marine funds for facilities. Of them, the G Association provides a credit guarantee amounting to 85% of the amount of loan application in H to those fishermen who lack security capacity. The G Union provides loans by setting the amount equivalent to 80% to 85% of the cost of building vessels or the cost of purchasing fishing vessels, upon receipt of the vessel sales contract or the cost of building fishing vessels from the fishermen who apply for facility funds, and after issuance of the letter of guarantee by H, the G Union provides loans.

[Contents of the mother] On January 2015, the Defendant: (a) listened to the horses that “when entering into an agreement with F to cover the costs of building a fishing vessel with F, it may be allowed to dry only H loan; and (b) rather, money may remain remaining” from the above F while advertising the place and method of raising the cost of building a vessel for cutting a deep-sea fishing vessel; and (c) was willing to build a fishing vessel for cutting a deep-sea fishing from the above F; (d) the Defendant approved the agreement by C to “a vessel construction contract and a loan borrowed from the name of the cost of building a vessel; and (e) the Defendant was able to proceed with the process of building a vessel under C’s name; and (e) the Defendant applied for a loan of H guarantee after preparing a contract to cover the costs of building a vessel with D and a loan.

arrow