Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant is the actual representative of the C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “C”), and C was under the proceeding with E, F, etc. claiming a lien on the building D (hereinafter “instant building”) acquired by the said company, and during the proceeding for delivery of the building.
On July 28, 2013, the Defendant adopted E and F, which interfered with the exercise of the right of retention by G, H and I, as a witness of a case involving obstruction of work, etc. by Daejeon District Court Decision 2014 High Order 1614, which used EF’s testimony as a lawsuit for the delivery of the building.
Therefore, the Defendant, in May 2015, made a false testimony to the effect that, from “K” located in the jurisdiction of the Seo-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, 2015, the Defendant did not possess any other lien holders, including the parties, before L corporation goes bankrupt on July 26, 2006, and that, from the bankruptcy of L corporation (hereinafter “L”), the possession of the lien holders began after the bankruptcy of L corporation (hereinafter “L”). By doing so, the Defendant would give priority to securing damage to the claims of the Party.
The E-F made a resolution to make a false testimony by requesting the testimony of the false fact.
However, from October 2004 to April 2005, E had been performing the construction of the instant building at the time when he subcontracted the instant interior construction to E, and even many construction business operators, including F, who did not receive construction cost from L, did not constitute a claim group, and had been aware of the fact that he occupied the instant building and exercised the lien from March 20, 2005.
The Defendant is present at the court of Daejeon District Court No. 1, 2014 High Order No. 1614, which was located in 7-gil, Nam-dong, Nam-gu, Daejeon District Court at around 10:0 on June 2, 2015, as a witness of the instant case, such as interference with the work set forth in 2014 High Order No. 1614.