1. The defendant's KRW 114,139,790 for the plaintiff and 5% per annum from June 29, 2004 to May 2, 2006.

1. Indication of claim: The defendant, on March 26, 2004, by deceiving the plaintiff that he would manage the game machine and pay at least two times the profit, and by deceiving the plaintiff that he would receive at least two times the total sum of the investment amount from the plaintiff during the period from March 26, 2004 to June 29, 2004, received 262,30,000 won for the purchase cost of 79.48 game machine. This constitutes a tort, and the defendant demanded the payment of the investment amount of 114,139,790 won which has not yet been refunded as compensation for damages and damages after the date of termination of the tort (the claim for interruption of the extinctive prescription of the judgment of Seoul East East District Court Decision 2006Ga265 delivered on July 6, 2006). The applicable provisions of law were not applied to the case (Article 208 (3) 1 and Article 257 of the Civil Procedure Act).