Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for a year and four months, and for a defendant B, for six months, respectively.

provided that this ruling has become final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

1. Defendant A

A. On January 18, 2020, the Defendant: (a) around 02:16 on January 18, 2020, the Defendant: (b) carried a day-to-day and drinking at the “E” restaurant operated by the victim D and carried out a mobile phone call with a mobile phone; (c) laid his own cell phone on the floor; (d) cut off the table, and destroyed the market price of the victim’s ownership by avoiding the disturbance; (e) one consignee, two chairs; (e) two frauds; (g) three fire parts; (g) three glasss; and (g) glasss and water purifierss.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the victim's property.

B. At around 02:23 on January 18, 2020, the Defendant: (a) was under the influence of alcohol at the same place as the foregoing paragraph; (b) was under the influence of alcohol to the Victim F (the age of 42); (c) was under the control of the Victim F (the age of 42); (d) was under the control of the Victim F; (c) was under the control of the Victim; (d) was under the control of the Victim; and (e) was under the control of the Victim at one time; and (e) on the same day, the Defendant was under the control of the Victim G (the age of 40) by gathering the chair who was under the control of the Victim.

Accordingly, the defendant committed violence against the victims.

C. The Defendant is obstruction of the performance of official duties.

paragraphs 1 and 2.

On January 18, 2020, the police officer of the Posnnam Police Station, who was reported 112 as a result of the crime as stated in the port, was on board the patrol vehicle and carried out voluntarily by the patrol vehicle by the police officer of the Posnnam Police Station and the chief police officer. On January 18, 2020, the police officer of the Posnnam Police Station located in K at the port of service, who was requested by I to get out of the patrol vehicle before the port of service at the port of service at the port of service at the port of service at the port of service at the port of service at the port of service at the port of service at the port of service at the port of service at the port of service at the port of service at the port of service at the port of service, and the police officer

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the police officer's 112 reporting handling duties, investigation of crimes, maintenance of order, etc.

2. Defendant B: (a) sought at the Hamban Police Station at the south-gu Hamban Police Station located in K at the port between around 02:45, Jan. 18, 2020 and around 03:10, and (b) viewed Defendant B to have checked for committing the same crime as described in paragraph (1), and (c) sent the above security guard I to the above.