A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. A person who is engaged in driving of a c bargaining vehicle in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes and the Road Traffic Act.

At around 13:15 on August 9, 2013, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol of 0.194% of blood alcohol concentration, was driving three-lanes in front of the Seocheon-dong Office, Seocheon-gu, Incheon, Seocheon-gu, Incheon, from a family distance room to a public village distance room, the Defendant, who was negligent in performing duties at the front right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right and the part of the victim D (n., 35 years old) driving while driving in the front right bank due to occupational negligence, got the rear part of the above front part of the vehicle, thereby causing injury to the victim D, and at the same time, damaged the above 7-day repair cost to damage the 7-day repair cost, 968 won.

In addition, while the Defendant escaped, at around 13:18, while moving ahead of the road in front of the 13:17 Scenic range, Seocheon High School, Seocheon High School, Seocheon High School, in order to turn to the left from the next line due to occupational negligence, he neglected the duty of her on the left and right of the front line. At the same time, the Defendant got back the part of the Gco of the victim F (the age of 47), followed the left side of the vehicle and got back to the left side of the vehicle in front of the above frighting vehicle to receive approximately two weeks of medical treatment, and at the same time, the above cco has also damaged the 1,523,837 won of the repair cost to the victim F.

As a result, the defendant suffered injury from the victims, and even if the victims damage their vehicles, they did not immediately stop and abscond without taking measures such as providing relief to the victims.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (driving) driving a frighting vehicle under the influence of alcohol with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.194% at the time and place specified in paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to F and D;

1. The actual condition survey report;