A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a motor vehicle B with the highest speed in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Egressing Vehicles) and the Road Traffic Act (Egress after accidents).

A. On January 24, 2015, the first accident Defendant proceeded in two lanes, one of four lanes, namely, the distance of the bridge located in the Chuncheon-si, Gi-si, Gi-si, Gi-si, and the distance of the bridge from the shooting distance protection area in the wholesale market to the distance of the autopsy.

At the time, there was a traffic signal waiting vehicle in the front door, so in such a case, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to report the traffic situation to the driver of the vehicle well and to prevent the accident in advance by safely driving the vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to pay attention to the front week, and conflict with the driving of the victim C(21 tax) of the victim C(21 tax) waiting for the signal prior to the collision with the front of the low-speed car.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by negligence in the above occupational negligence, suffered from the fluore finites, etc. of the above victim E of the damaged vehicle, in the light of the trend requiring two-day medical treatment, and went away from the scene without taking any measures even though the repair cost of KRW 351,048 was damaged to the 351,048.

B. On January 24, 2015, the second accident Defendant: (a) caused occupational negligence to neglect the duty of the preceding week on the road in front of the Guri-si, 04:36 on the road; (b) and (c) caused the collision with the front part of the vehicle of the victim G (57) with the top part of the vehicle of the vehicle of the victim of the Hmo-gu, which driven by the victim G (57).

As a result, the Defendant suffered from the victim G by occupational negligence about two weeks in need of medical treatment, and at the same time, went away from the site without taking any measures even though the repair cost of KRW 260,248 damaged the damaged vehicle.

3. On January 24, 2015, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (Refusal of measurement of drinking).