logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전고등법원(청주) 2015.02.03 2014나698
공사대금
Text

1. Of the part regarding the counterclaim in the judgment of the court of first instance, 33,663,223 won against the Defendant (Counterclaim Defendant).

Reasons

.: The rate of liquidated damages shall be 15 days after the completion of the construction work on August 25, 201; the balance shall be settled within 15 days after the completion of the construction work; the first intermediate payment of KRW 130,000,000 shall be settled at the end of July 15, 201; the intermediate payment of KRW 195,000 on July 30, 201; the late payment of KRW 195,000 on July 30, 201; the late payment of KRW 75,000,000 on August 25, 201; the late payment of the construction work shall be 0.1% (the completion of the construction work shall be at the time of the completion of the construction work; the remaining part of the construction work or the part of the contractor shall be excluded); the work shall be included in the estimate or specifications of the Plaintiff; and the work shall be included in the design or specifications of all under the contract; the work shall be included in the work.

* All quantities entered within the scope of construction are deemed to be included in the contractual quantities, and there is no additional settlement following the increase in additional quantities.

* The agent of the contractor in connection with this Agreement will be deemed to be Defendant D, omitting separate notice of appointment.

“Special Agreement (Scope of Construction)”

I. Mourine II. Molasses (total repairs and arsensium) III. External walls construction

2. 커튼홀 및 3층, 4층 통꺽은 유리, 5층 통유리 창호 및 강화유리로 교체

4. Lighting of outer walls;

5. Emergency stairs: Reinforcement of walls, waterproof, waterproofing, painting, replacement of tubes, and knife chlori with knife IV. Other

B. After that, the Plaintiff continued the instant construction. From September 2010 to November 201 of the same year, the Defendant commenced the instant franchise and female bath business (hereinafter “brine”).

(A) there is a dispute between the source and the defendant with regard to the specific time of commencement of business.

From July 9, 2011 to September 8, 201, the instant telecom.

arrow