logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2017.06.02 2016고정582
공갈
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 4, 2015, the Defendant agreed to use a “F” program that can share substitute drivers with “C” operated by the Defendant and “E operated by the victim D” together, and the victim was unable to engage in C business due to the reversal of the aforementioned agreement on July 22, 2015, and the victim reported the details of the tax evasion to the Simpo Tax Office and received compensation for the C business loss from the victim.

around 01:00 on September 3, 2015, the Defendant stated that “I would like to submit additional data to the tax office if I would like to give money to the victim at the tax office without giving money to the victim at the tax office” at the H coffee shop located in G, which was held on September 3, 2015, and had the victim submit additional data on the details of the victim’s tax evasion to the tax office at the wooden tax office, thereby causing any harm to the victim’s personal information.

around 15:00 on September 10, 2015, the Defendant: (a) prepared a written performance statement stating that “to receive KRW 15 million on the same day on the condition that he/she did not submit additional data on a tax evasion case being investigated at a tax office at a tax office at a tax office at a tax office at a tax office at a tax office at a tax office at a tax office at a tax office at a tax office at a tax office; (b) received KRW 15 million from the person who suffered frighten in the Defendant’s intimidation to the Defendant’s agricultural bank account at KRW 15 million on the same day.

Accordingly, the defendant received property by threatening the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. The witness D and J's respective legal statements, and the witness K's partial legal statements;

1. Entry of D in the suspect examination protocol against the accused in the prosecution, or part of the defendant's statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the complaint, details of transactions of admission and withdrawal, and recording records;

1. Relevant Article 350 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 350 (Selection of Penalty Penalty) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

arrow