The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. misunderstanding of the gist of the grounds for appeal (the fact of prosecution that the defendant did not have any fact that there was no physical part of the victim, such as the statement of the fact of prosecution, and even if the defendant was physically contacted with the victim, the defendant did not intentionally contact the victim with the victim);

2. According to the evidence records 8, 15, and 40 pages of the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below's judgment, the defendant can be acknowledged as having contacted the victim's body as stated in the facts charged. In full view of the defendant's physical part part of the victim's body extending out to the victim's body, the defendant's protruding line at the time, and the type of the victim's suspect who was seated, it is recognized that there was an intentional indecent act on the part of the defendant. Thus, the defendant's argument disputing this issue is rejected.

Defendant’s defense counsel additionally claims of unfair sentencing are made in addition to the statement of grounds for appeal. In full view of all the circumstances leading to the crime by suicide, the means and methods of the crime, the circumstances after the crime, and other conditions of sentencing as shown in the records and arguments in this case, including the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, etc., it is not recognized that the sentence of the lower court is too unreasonable.

3. According to the conclusion, the appeal of this case by the defendant is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit.