Text
All appeals filed by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.
Reasons
1. Summary of grounds for appeal;
A. The Defendant asserted to the effect that the lower court erred by misapprehending the fact and adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment, thereby adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment, even though the Defendant merely lent KRW 4.50,00 to C, and did not purchase the psychotropic drug psychotropic drug c (one clopon; hereinafter “philopon”).
B. The prosecutor’s "the part of the facts charged in this case concerning the phiphone medication shall be summarized as follows: the date and time of the crime shall not exceed 2 months on the basis of the Defendant’s results of appraisal of the Defendant’s hair; the place where the crime was committed on the date of presentation; and in light of the gravity of the narcotics crime, the facts charged were specified; however, the judgment below which held that this part of the facts charged cannot be deemed to constitute an entry of specific facts, thereby affecting the conclusion
2. Determination
A. 1) The Defendant of this part of the facts charged is a person who is not entitled to handle psychotropic drugs. The Defendant, around 11:00 on June 2, 2013, purchased philopon in front of the agricultural cooperative located in the Dolon Dolon Dolon, through C with KRW 4.50,00,00 to D through C, and purchased philopon in a way that wlopon wlon wlon wlon wlon wlon wlon wlon wlon wlon wlon wl on a
3. The following circumstances revealed by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below and the court below's judgment, i.e., ① received 4.50,00 won from the defendant from the court below and the court of the party court, and stated that C had a philopon, and the defendant had a philopon. ② D is consistent with C's statement by delivering C's philopon to the defendant and receiving 4.50,00 won from the defendant in the court of the court below,