beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant was married with C from around 2010 to May 2014, and the victim D and E are the victims.
1. On August 2013, the Defendant: (a) around August 2013, the Defendant purchased telephone and Kakaoo Television No. 508 of Jeju, 2013 to the victims on telephone and Kakao Stockholm; and (b) concluded that “In Jeju, F. G, No. 508 of the Republic of Korea, and made a lease business, and divided by half of the monthly rent.”
However, in fact, even if the defendant received demand for the debt from the victims, he did not have any intention or ability to pay the above money by dividing it into the victims and the profits by running the leasing business, even if he received the demand for payment from the victims.
The Defendant deceptioned the victims and received KRW 35,500,000 in total, around August 13, 2013, through the bank account under the name of the Defendant, from the victim D, and received KRW 35,50,000,000 in total, around August 20, 2013, and KRW 10,000 in around August 19, 2013 from the victim E.
2. On October 30, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around October 2013, via telephone calls and Kakao Stockholm, to the victim D; and (b) on October 30, 2013, the Defendant would provide the full amount of the proceeds from the lease to another person of the land located in Jeju-do in its name and from the lease of the land at a monthly rate.
“.....”
However, in fact, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay the agreed profit even if he received the money from the injured party because the defendant did not have the intention to rent the money. At the time, the defendant was instructed to pay the debt of the bond business operator, and there was no intention or ability to pay the money.
The Defendant, by deceiving the same victim, received KRW 25,00,000 from the injured party around October 31, 2013.
3. On January 2014, the Defendant: (a) around January 2014, the Defendant: (b) around Franchiscis in Franchiscis in Franchiscis; (c) on January 2014, the Defendant: (d) caused the Defendant to have the Victim D to lose the Ban that the customer left; and (d) on January 12, 200.