1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On June 2, 2012, the Defendant: (a) paid the construction cost of KRW 1,300,000 (in the instant construction project, separate value-added tax; and (b) to the tax office in the case of the general construction in Thai-do, the amount of value-added tax to be paid by the Defendant for the comprehensive construction in Thai-do, as KRW 1,200,000; and (c) accordingly, agreed that the amount of value-added tax to be paid by the Defendant for the comprehensive construction in Tae-do, as KRW 120,000; (d) on September 1, 2012, 2012; (e) on February 15, 2013; (e) on February 15, 2013; (e) on February 2, 2000; (e) on February 2, 200; and (e) on February 1, 2000; and (e) on January 1, 1000000.

B. On November 15, 2012, an agreement was concluded on November 15, 2012 to provide the Plaintiff with a subcontract price of KRW 145,00,000 (excluding value-added tax), the construction period from November 25, 2012 to February 5, 2013, with a rate of 1/10,000 for delay compensation (hereinafter “instant subcontract”), and the advance payment out of the construction price shall be paid KRW 14,50,000, and the completion payment shall be paid in accordance with the terms and conditions of the project owner’s payment.

C. The Plaintiff completed the instant subcontracted project on September 20, 2013, and the instant subcontracted project was completed on October 22, 2013, and the Defendant obtained approval for the use of a building newly constructed from the competent Boan City on October 31, 2013.

The Plaintiff is out of the terms of the instant subcontract agreement, taking into account the period and volume increase and decrease during the instant subcontract construction project around November 2013.