1. The plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant).

purport, purport, and.

1. The scope of the judgment of the court of this case is the claim of this case, and the plaintiff claimed against the defendant for compensation for the king medical expenses and damages equivalent to the future medical expenses due to a tort, and the defendant claimed compensation for consolation money due to a tort against the plaintiff as the counterclaim of this case. The court of first instance rendered a judgment dismissing both the plaintiff's claim of the principal lawsuit and the defendant's counterclaim, and only the plaintiff appealed against the part concerning the claim of the principal lawsuit of the court of first instance. Thus, the scope of judgment of this court is limited to the plaintiff's claim of the principal lawsuit of this case.

2. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion and the Defendant are the occupants of the Yongsan-si Seoul Metropolitan Area C Apartment (hereinafter “instant apartment”).

On January 26, 2015, the Plaintiff was commissioned as the chairperson of the election commission to perform election-related affairs to elect representatives from each apartment building of this case. The representative of the apartment building of this case was set on March 5, 2015, and thereafter performed election-related affairs.

However, the Defendant sent each of the following documents to the Plaintiff conducting the election-related business as above: (a) around February 2, 2015, at least four times before and after the election day of the representative of the instant apartment building; (b) around February 26, 2015: (c) around February 26, 2015; (d) around March 16, 2015; and (e) around March 31, 2015: (c) around March 31, 2015; and (d) around March 31, 2015, sent each of the following documents (hereinafter collectively referred to as “each of the instant documents”; (e) the Plaintiff, the chairperson of the instant apartment election commission, other election management members; and (e) the representative of the instant apartment building; and (e) the Plaintiff’s reputation or public interest.