1. The Defendant on November 24, 201, as to the motor vehicles indicated in the separate sheet from Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and Appointed C.

1. Around November 24, 2011, the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the Appointed C (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiff”) offered and delivered a motor vehicle listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter referred to as “the instant motor vehicle”) as security by borrowing KRW 4 million from the Defendant who engages in credit business in the name of “D”, with the name of “D” (hereinafter referred to as “D”).

At the time, the Plaintiffs agreed to repay the instant automobile with substitute if they fail to repay the secured obligation within the agreed period.

Since the Plaintiffs failed to repay the secured obligation within the agreed period thereafter, the ownership of the instant motor vehicle shall be transferred to the Defendant by payment in substitutes.

Nevertheless, the Defendant is not obliged to pay taxes and public charges while driving the instant automobile, but also transfers the ownership of the instant automobile. As such, the Defendant seeks to acquire the ownership transfer registration by the instant lawsuit, and also seeks to confirm that the Defendant is also liable for tax payment.

2. Judgment by service (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act).