1. The defendant is liable to the plaintiff on December 2, 199 to grant registration office of Daejeon District Court with respect to the answer B 1,977 square meters in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun.

1. The plaintiff's decision on the cause of the claim is as C's son, D's son, and D's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's

According to this, the land of this case is owned by C, who is a citizen of the Republic of Korea, who is not Japan, and is not a property devolving upon the State under the Act on the Disposal of Property Belonging. Thus, the ownership transfer registration of this case, which is completed by treating the land of this case as the property devolving upon the State, shall be deemed null and void

Therefore, barring special circumstances, the Defendant is liable to implement the procedure for registration of cancellation of ownership transfer of this case to the Plaintiff, who is a co-owner of the land in this case, as one of C’s inheritors.

2. The defendant's assertion is asserted that the period of prescription for acquisition of the registry has expired since he occupied it in a peaceful and peaceful manner for not less than 10 years with the intention of ownership after the completion of the registration of ownership transfer of this case. Therefore, in the case of the acquisition of the registry, it is necessary not to have been negligent in the commencement of possession, and the burden of proof as to this is deemed to be a person who asserts the acquisition of prescription. Since there is no evidence that there was no negligence at the time of

3. If so, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.