logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2017.05.16 2017고정89
근로기준법위반
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The Defendant, as the representative of C Co., Ltd., which had a 201 building B (201), is an employer who employs approximately five full-time workers and engages in ship design business.

The Defendant did not pay KRW D’s wages of KRW 3,375,425, which he/she retired from the said workplace from February 24, 2015 to July 9, 2015, 14 days from the date of his/her retirement without agreement on the extension of the payment deadline.

2. The facts charged of the instant case are crimes falling under Articles 109(1) and 36 of the Labor Standards Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent. Since the victim expressed his intention not to punish the Defendant after the instant indictment was instituted, the instant indictment is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow