The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

purport.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Defendant is a company running “C Sariba” (hereinafter “instant bath”).

B. On November 13, 2017, the Plaintiff suffered injury, such as the pressure duplicatings No. 3 and the pressure duplicatings No. 12, beyond the scope of the Defendant’s above duplica operated by the Defendant.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 and 4-1, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff was injured by a high rail installed on the floor of a bath connected to damp rain or entrance of the instant bath after completing a rained rain in the instant bath, or by moving from damp rain to shower facilities in the bath room, and without recognizing the difference of stairs installed in the middle, the Plaintiff suffered injury, as it goes beyond vadi, since it did not recognize the difference of stairs installed in the middle.

The defendant is liable to pay the plaintiff medical expenses, loss, consolation money, etc. due to the above accident, inasmuch as the defendant neglected to pay the plaintiff a duty of care to make the height of the floor of the damp rain or the bath at the entrance and the bath so that customers do not go beyond the process of coming from the damp rain or to move from the damp rain, or the plaintiff suffers the above injury despite the duty of care not to install a slided stairs in the process of moving from the damp rain.

3. Determination

A. First, in light of each image of evidence Nos. 2 and 1, it is difficult to see that there exists a high-quality rail, such as the Plaintiff’s assertion on the floor of a bath which is connected to damp rain or entrance, in light of the following: (a) whether the Plaintiff’s completion of a rain plant in damp rain and exceeded “high railing” installed on the floor of a bath which is connected to damp rain or entrance.

Therefore, this part of the plaintiff's assertion is without merit.

B. Next, the Plaintiff did not recognize the difference of stairs installed in the middle while moving from damp-in to shower facilities within damp-in and bath-in.