logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2015.08.19 2014나11109
손해배상(자)
Text

1. Of the judgment of the first instance court, the part against the Plaintiff A corporation is modified as follows:

Defendant corporation.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. (1) Fact finding that the following facts do not conflict between the parties, or can be acknowledged in full view of Gap evidence Nos. 2 through 5, 14, and the entire purport of the pleadings as a result of the CD verification by this court, including images, and the whole purport of the arguments.

(A) The Plaintiff A Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) is the owner of the instant cargo vehicle C (hereinafter “the instant cargo vehicle”). The Plaintiff B is the driver of the instant cargo vehicle, and the Defendant Peace Tourism Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Co., Ltd.”) is the owner of the instant cargo vehicle E-B bus (hereinafter “the instant bus”), and the Plaintiff’s Federation of the Korea Bus Transport Business Association (hereinafter “Defendant Federation”) entered into a mutual aid agreement on the instant bus with the Defendant Company. D is the driver of the Defendant Company.

(B) At around 16:15 on July 27, 2012, D, driving the instant bus and driving the instant bus into the front part of the instant bus, which led the Plaintiff B, driving the instant truck in the same direction as a sudden fault and led the Plaintiff B, driving the instant truck and driving the instant truck in the same direction as the rear part of the instant bus in the front part of the instant bus, while changing the bus to the second lane of the instant bus, while driving the instant bus into the front part of the instant bus, from the Jung-gu, Ulsan-gu, U.S., to the Jung-gu, Jung-gu, U.S., the main part of the instant bus.

(C) Due to the instant accident, the Plaintiff B suffered from the crymal spawals, etc. requiring treatment for two weeks, and the instant cargo was damaged and the cargo loaded therefrom was diminished.

(2) According to the above facts of recognition, the accident of this case does not turn on the direction light without examining the existence and attitude of other vehicles passing through the lane intended to enter in the alteration of the lane.

arrow