1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation of this case is as follows, except for adding the following judgments as to the new argument of the plaintiff’s trial at the court of first instance, and therefore, it is identical to the part concerning the reasoning of the judgment at the court of first instance. Thus, this is cited by the main text of Article 420 of

2. Additional determination is alleged to the effect that the Defendant’s assertion that the Plaintiff has a separate legal personality from the non-party company is not permissible in light of the principle of good faith, since the Plaintiff abused the corporate system to achieve the illegal purpose of evading obligations of the non-party company. However, the evidence alone submitted by the Plaintiff alone that it is difficult to recognize that C had established the same type and content of the non-party company and the company with the intent to evade obligations against the Plaintiff, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it differently.

3. Thus, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.