1. The Defendant’s disciplinary action for three months of suspension from office against the Plaintiff on April 7, 2014 shall be revoked.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. Since the Plaintiff was appointed as a teacher on July 1, 1980, the Plaintiff continues his school life.

From March 1, 2013, the B middle schools (hereinafter referred to as "schools") under the Defendant and the Sungnam District Office of Education (hereinafter referred to as "Office of Education") have worked as the principal (hereinafter referred to as "schools") teachers.

B. On July 15, 2013, the School Governance Committee decided to remodel the 275 square meters of a villa in a school as a student restaurant. On October 21, 2013, the Plaintiff was notified by the competent supervisory authority that the safety facilities related to fire-fighting and gas should comply with the relevant laws and regulations, by ordering the C superintendent of the school to promote structural alteration so that the C superintendent of the school can use the multi-purpose room as a dormitory for the camping club, and that consultation with the Office of Education, which is the competent supervisory authority, was conducted, but on the ground that the safety facilities related to fire-fighting and gas should comply with the relevant laws and regulations.

C. On October 25, 2013, the Plaintiff held a conference for the establishment of a dormitory in the camphouse in the school principal room.

At this day, the Council, the educational members and the head of the Office of Education, etc. present, explained the above results of the review of the Office of Education, but the Scholarship will be able to re-examine the legal basis and conduct construction once again, but if the plaintiff submits the dormitory design drawings through the regular official letter, he/she will review them and decide whether to approve the construction, and all participants including the plaintiff accepted them.

On November 1, 2013, the Plaintiff was reported by the head of the school administration office, etc. on the guidance for the establishment of dormitories, the accounting of the school development fund required for the Corporation, and the approval procedure of the supervisory authority for the alteration of the structure of the facility.

However, without going through the above procedures, the Plaintiff contracted the construction of the above facilities to Magro Co., Ltd., Ltd., and the said company started the construction work on November 3, 2013, which is Sundays.

E. The chief of the administrative office shall undertake the commencement of the foregoing construction on November 4, 2013.