1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

The grounds alleged by the plaintiff in the first instance court while filing an appeal are not significantly different from the contents alleged by the plaintiff in the first instance court, and even if all the evidence submitted by the first instance court and this court are examined, it cannot be deemed inappropriate to regard the comparative standard, transaction cases, and compensation example selected by the appraiser in the first instance court to calculate a legitimate amount of compensation. Thus, the first instance court's decision rejecting the plaintiff's assertion is justifiable

Therefore, the reasoning of the judgment of the court on this case is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, in addition to the parts used or added as follows. Thus, this Court shall accept it in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[Supplementary or additional parts] The respective “this Court” of the first instance court, 5 pages 3, 4 pages 11, 12, and 5 pages 15 of the first instance judgment, shall be deemed to be the first instance court.

In the judgment of the first instance court, the inquiry results on the C appraiser's office of this court is the result of the inquiry into the first instance court and the C appraiser's office of this court.

The following shall be added to the five pages 1 of the first instance judgment:

The plaintiff asserts that it is unlawful to calculate the amount of compensation based on the written appraisal by the appraiser of the court of first instance, since the appraiser of the court did not state the basis for determining the amount of compensation in comparison with the individual factors of the land subject to the transaction case and the reference land, such as access conditions, natural conditions, administrative conditions, and other conditions.

However, according to the result of the appraisal commission made by the first instance court against A, when comparing the individual factors of the land subject to transaction case and the reference land, the court appraiser specified the specific factors such as access conditions, natural conditions, administrative conditions, and other conditions, and described the reasons for comparison by each factor.