The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The punishment sentenced by the first instance court to the summary of the reasons for appeal (six months of imprisonment) shall be too unreasonable;

2. The Defendant is recognized as a favorable sentencing factor, such as the fact that it is difficult for the Defendant to form a family and has brain disease disorder, and that he reflects his mistake in depth.

However, if the Defendant, without a driver’s license, was involved in an accident leading to a serious accident while driving a vehicle in a drunken state (0.231%) without a driver’s license, the Defendant also recognized an unfavorable sentencing factor, such as the following: (a) there were many kinds of criminal records; (b) there were many kinds of criminal records against the Defendant; and (c) there were two times after 2009 or less penalties for driving a vehicle not covered by mandatory insurance; and (d) if the Defendant was born to drive a vehicle without a mandatory insurance, the Defendant’s awareness of complying with the law is rare.

In full view of the aforementioned factors of sentencing and the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, intelligence and environment, motive and background leading to the instant crime, the means and consequence of the instant crime, and other circumstances revealed in the pleadings, the sentence sentenced by the first instance court is deemed to be adequate, and it cannot be deemed that it is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.