Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, as a tenant of Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Ctel 616, requested documents, such as the management rules, minutes, etc. of the management body, even though he/she is not a member of the council of occupants' representatives (hereinafter referred to as the "management body"), as a tenant of the said officetel, has raised a problem

1. On September 7, 2012, the Defendant: (a) around the Internet portal site and thereafter, operated the business at the place of “the list of the representative executive officers of low-income officetels who are harshly engaged in misappropriation” (the owner of No. 806 and current residence); (b) the president E (the owner of No. 806 and current residence); (c) the vice president of G Real Estate Act No. 103-2; (d) the tenants and current tenants (103-2);

11th floor x 11th floor x an officetel owner), the auditor H (the president of the International Animal Hospital No. 102, the veterinarian of the 102, the owner and the business), the managing members J (the owner and the current business in the 617 owner and the current location) and the K of managing members (the owner and the present resident in 102).

However, there was no fact that executives, including E, who are the representatives of the management body, committed corruption or embezzled funds in connection with the operation of the management body.

Nevertheless, for the purpose of slandering, the Defendant, through the information and communications network, disclosed false information openly, thereby impairing the honor of victims.

2. The Defendant, around September 10, 2012, damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts by publicly pointing out the following facts: (a) around September 10, 2012, the Defendant: (b) at the street of the first floor of the instant Cofficetel; (c) as a reproduction of documents kept by the management office; and (d) as a matter of the victim’s 112 reporting and being dispatched to the management office; and (d) as the police officers, etc., who were given notice of the victim’s 112 reporting; and (c) as the victim committed corruption or embezzlement with F and H in relation to the management of the management body.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's partial statement 1.1.