1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

A. Of the one-story 215.51 square meters of a building listed in the attached Table list, indication 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 7 of the attached Form.

In full view of the facts without dispute between the parties and the overall purport of the statements and arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, the plaintiff, on February 24, 2015, determined the lease deposit amount of 20 million won, monthly rent of 132.2 square meters in the ship (hereinafter "the lease part of this case") connecting each point of the attached Form No. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 1 among the 1st floor of the building indicated in the attached Table No. 215.51 square meters of the building indicated in the attached Table No. 1, 2015 to the defendant on February 24, 2015 (hereinafter "lease No. 300,000 won and value-added tax) and the defendant on February 23, 2017 (hereinafter "Lease No. 201, 200,0000 won) as the basis of the following facts:

According to the above facts, the lease of this case was lawfully terminated by the delivery of a copy of the complaint of this case containing the plaintiff's intention to terminate the lease contract on the ground of rent for at least three consecutive years, and the defendant is obligated to deliver the leased part of this case to the plaintiff and to pay the plaintiff the overdue rent and unjust enrichment equivalent to the overdue rent according to the ratio of the 2.5 million won per month from February 25, 2019 to the completion date of the delivery of the leased part of this case (the sum of the rent of this case, the value added tax, the management fee) from February 25, 2019 to

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.