A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

On March 23, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor at the Jeonju District Court for fraud, and on October 22, 2017, the military prison completed the execution of the sentence on October 22, 2017.

【Criminal Facts】

No person shall, in using and managing the means of access to electronic financial transactions, borrow or lend the means of access while receiving, demanding or promising any compensation therefor.

Nevertheless, the defendant, on May 23, 2018, leased the e-mail card to the third party for 2-day period from a person who has not been injured in his name, 3 million won will be given.

“After receiving the proposal, I sent one e-mail card connected to the bank account in the name of the defendant using Kwikset Service in front of the apartment apartment B in 11:00 on the same day.

Accordingly, the Defendant promised to receive compensation and lent the means of access.

On March 23, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for fraud at the Jeonju District Court on March 23, 2016, and completed the execution of the sentence in the military prison on October 22, 2017, and was not detained by the Jeonju District Court on September 6, 2018 and currently pending trial.

Criminal facts

On April 25, 2018, the Defendant: (a) purchased G Sti vehicle from F located in Geumcheon-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City E on April 25, 2018; (b) borrowed KRW 15 million from the victim HH Co., Ltd.; and (c) on April 26, 2018, established a collateral security under the victim’s name, the claim value of which is KRW 7.5 million on the said vehicle

Nevertheless, around June 2018, the defendant borrowed 2 million won from the bonds company registered in his name in the Yongsan-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong and offered the above vehicle as security, and

Accordingly, the defendant concealed the goods of the defendant, which is the object of the victim's right, and interfered with the victim's exercise of right.

Summary of Evidence

"2018 Highest 1825"

1. The defendant;