The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is the owner of Ansan-gu apartment C apartment 106 Dong 2004 and the victim D is a person who operates a "F Authorized Brokerage Office" in accordance with Article 102 of the Mayang-gu E apartment shopping mall 102 in Ansan-gu, Ansan-gu.

On April 1, 2016, the Defendant entered into a real estate transaction agreement with G to sell the apartment owned by the Defendant as a broker to G buyers the total purchase price of KRW 450 million, and received delivery of KRW 15 million as a contract deposit and an intermediate payment in the same place.

However, on April 2, 2016, the Defendant: (a) received a call from the victim on April 2, 2016 to the effect that “if each recipient does not fung fung fin fin fin fin fin fin fin fin fin fin fin fin fin fin fin fin fin fin fin fin fin f.” and received the said repair cost at each fin fin fin f

15 million won was remitted and returned in full.

Nevertheless, on the ground that the injured party conspired with the buyer to buy and induce the cancellation of the sales contract, the defendant had the mind to hold one person's pocketet demonstration in front of the public broker office operated by the victim.

On December 1, 2016, the Defendant should be held responsible for causing damage to the good faith, prior to the “F Authorized Brokerage Office” operated by the injured party on December 1, 2016.

In the inside of the above situation, wrong acts are done to receive the full amount of down payment and intermediate payment without penalty.

I am too much of the damages, and do so.

In addition to “a stampet” and one person’s demonstration, from that time to December 17, 2016, spread false facts through the same method 13 times in total, as shown in the list of offenses, thereby hindering the victim’s authorized broker’s business operation.

2. In the context of a single comprehensive offence of determination.