logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.03.29 2018나46669
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court of first instance’s explanation concerning this case is as follows: (a) the statement of evidence Nos. 22 through 27 (including paper numbers) which is insufficient to acknowledge the plaintiff’s assertion as evidence additionally submitted in the court of first instance; and (b) the third 8 and 9 of the judgment of first instance are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of first instance, except for the use of the third 8 and 9 of the judgment as follows; and (c) thus, they are cited pursuant to the main sentence of Article 4

"In the absence of dispute", Gap evidence Nos. 1, 5, 6, 14, 23 (including paper numbers), Eul evidence Nos. 2, 3, and 8, witness of the first instance court, H, K, and L's testimony, the purport of the whole pleadings."

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow