The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal by the defense counsel is against the mistake of the defendant, and the period of the crime of this case is relatively short and sales, and the defendant fully paid a surcharge after the decision of the court below was rendered, and the defendant discontinued his/her business with no record of criminal punishment, and thus, the court below's punishment is too unreasonable in light of the following: imprisonment for up to eight months, suspension of execution, two years, probation and forty-hour suspension of sexual traffic, and orders to attend a course for confiscation, confiscation, 2,320,00 won and orders to attend a course for the prevention of commercial sex acts for up to 40 hours, and the punishment of the court below is too unreasonable.

2. The crime of this case is not deemed to have been committed as arranging sexual traffic to the customers found through the Internet advertisement, etc., and the act of arranging sexual traffic is highly harmful to society by commercializing women's sex and undermining sound sexual culture and good morals. In light of the motive and background of the crime of this case, circumstances before and after the crime of this case, degree of damage, and other various matters stipulated in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, which are conditions for sentencing, such as the records and arguments of this case, such as the character and conduct of the defendant, and the environment, the court below's punishment is not determined to be unfair even considering all the circumstances alleged in the grounds for appeal. Thus, the above assertion is without merit.

3. Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since there is no reason to do so. It is so decided as per Disposition.