logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2018.08.08 2017가단21968
건물명도(인도) 등
Text

1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) deliver the buildings listed in the separate sheet;

B. Attacheds 5,500,000 won and from September 11, 2017

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On September 10, 2010, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with the Defendant for the lease deposit amounting to KRW 20 million, monthly rent, from August 16, 2010 to August 15, 2012, between the lease deposit amounting to KRW 20 million with respect to the instant building, and the lease agreement between the Defendant and the Defendant for the lease agreement between September 10, 201 and September 9, 201, respectively.

B. On September 10, 2012, between C and D, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement between KRW 20 million with respect to the instant building, KRW 1.1 million with respect to monthly rent, and the term of the lease from September 10, 2012 to September 9, 2014. The special agreement includes the following: “The lessee recognizes that this agreement is an extension contract with the lessee and the terms of the lease agreement entered into with C on September 10, 2010.”

C. On July 3, 2014, the Plaintiff entered into a lease contract between the Defendant and KRW 20 million with respect to the instant building, KRW 1.1 million with respect to monthly rent (excluding value-added tax), and with the lease period from September 10, 2014 to September 9, 2015 (hereinafter “instant lease contract”). The special agreement provides that “The lessee knows that this contract is a representative change and extension of the terms of the lease contract entered into with C on September 10, 2010, and the lessee knows that it is well known that the contract was concluded with C on September 10, 201,” and “the Defendant succeeds to the lease contract by deeming that the deposit amount, which was concluded with C on September 10, 2010, after September 9, 2015, to ensure that the lessor would be able to perform reconstruction due to the deterioration of the building and return it to the lessor to its original state.”

arrow