A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

around April 2015 to May 2015, the Defendant served as an employee at the “D” restaurant operated by the victim C in Busan Dong-gu, Busan.

1. On April 7, 2015, the Defendant, within the above restaurant around April 7, 2015, experienced the breakdown of the air conditioners at the Afinch and the house in which “five months have passed.”

The loaned KRW 300,000,000, the air conditioners were repaired, used as the expenses of the Agro hospital, and repaid with the monthly wage.

However, the defendant did not have any money, and even if he borrowed money from the injured party, he did not have any intention or ability to pay it.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received 300,000 won from the victim to the post office account in the name of the Defendant on the same day by remittance.

2. On April 14, 2015, the Defendant: (a) on April 14, 2015, sealed the victim with “a house taxes.”

200,000 won was loaned to 200,000 won, which was paid immediately by monthly payment.

However, even if the defendant borrowed money from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to repay it.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received 200,000 won from the victim to the post office account in the name of the Defendant on the same day by remittance.

3. On April 18, 2015, the Defendant is located in the victim’s name in the above restaurant.

The land is the land located in the Kimhae Airport, and the land was sold in KRW 2.3 billion.

At present, Kim Li-hae airport and seal was affixed.

4. 28. or late.

5. Until July 1, 200, the Plaintiff provided that the Plaintiff would have to pay off money up to the time when he/she borrowed money.

However, in fact, the defendant did not have received land, and even if he borrowed money from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to repay it.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received a total of KRW 35.7 million from April 18, 2015 to May 7, 2015, and acquired it by transfer to the post office account in the name of the Defendant under the pretext of borrowing money.

Summary of Evidence

1..