logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.04.05 2017누78638
지정취소처분취소
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The grounds alleged by the defendant in the trial of the court of first instance do not differ from that alleged by the defendant in the court of first instance, and even if the evidence submitted in the court of first instance and the court of first instance are reviewed together with the defendant's assertion, the defendant's argument is rejected, and the judgment of the court of first instance, which accepted the plaintiff'

Therefore, this court's reasoning is the same as the entry of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, this court's reasoning is acceptable in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow