The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant had a mental disorder at the time of committing the instant crime.

B. In light of the fact that the defendant led to the confession and reflect of unreasonable sentencing, and that the defendant does not want the punishment of the defendant by agreement with the victims, the punishment sentenced by the court below (the punishment No. 1 Ga, Na and 2: imprisonment of February, 1-C, 1-D, Ma, Ba, 4 months) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. In light of the circumstance leading up to each of the crimes of this case, the contents of the defendant's statement about this, etc. acknowledged by the record of judgment on the assertion of mental and physical disorder, it cannot be deemed that the defendant had the ability to discern things or make decisions due to drinking at the time of each of the crimes of this case. Thus, the above assertion by the defendant is without merit

B. Even when considering the circumstances alleged in the Defendant’s assertion of unfair sentencing, each of the instant crimes committed by the Defendant not only interfere with the victim’s multiple business by avoiding any disturbance, such as finding the victim C, employees, and customers at a multi-faceted room operated by the victim C, around 19:0 each day from September 19, 2013 to September 23, 2013, police officers around October 2013, and police officers around April 15, 2014, around August 15, 2014, and around 07:40, and around 19:00, the Defendant refused to take advantage of the victim’s desire to take part in the instant crime (the Defendant was punished by a fine of no more than 19:0 each day from September 19, 2013 to September 23, 2013).