logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2018.12.13 2018고단3584
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the above fine is not paid, one hundred thousand won shall be converted into one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a vehicle with C low Pest another car.

On October 2, 2018, the Defendant driven the above car at around 08:50 on October 2, 2018, and led the E-section in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D to turn to the left at the right of the two-lanes between the five-lanes in the direction of the Goidong Station in the direction of the Goidong Station.

In this case, the driver of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle while keeping the commercial port directed by signal signals, etc.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and received the top left-hand part of the Victim FF (29 ) driving GW125 Obama, who violated the signal in the direction of the Gurijugian malian mar in the direction of the last part of the above low-speed mar car in front of the above high-speed mar car in violation of the signal.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim due to the above occupational negligence during approximately eight weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A statement of the occurrence of a traffic accident of F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as a traffic accident fact-finding report, an accident scene photograph, a black stuff photograph, and a medical certificate;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents Aggravated Punishment, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act: The victim's negligence in violation of the signal appears to have been the direct cause of the accident, the defendant repents and reflects his/her mistake, the vehicle of the defendant is covered by a comprehensive insurance, the primary offender is the defendant's age, sexual conduct, motive, means, and consequence;

arrow