The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. A favorable circumstance is recognized, such as the fact that the Defendant was found to have committed a crime in the first instance and against his mistake, that the Defendant had no criminal record more than a suspended sentence, and that the Defendant appears to have been given the opportunity to satisfe and satisfing the penalty through confinement life exceeding three months.

However, even though the defendant was punished for committing the crimes of the same kind of law, he/she again committed each of the crimes of the same case in the same way, even though a considerable period of time has passed from the crime of the same case, the defendant did not seem to make any effort to recover victims' damage, and the victims wish to punish the defendant, such as the victim D's wishing to punish the defendant, and all other factors of sentencing including the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, and circumstances after the crime, etc., it is difficult to say that the sentence imposed by the court below is unreasonable, and therefore the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.