Defendant

In addition, all appeals filed by the respondent for attachment order and the prosecutor are dismissed.

Summary of Grounds for Appeal

The defendant and the person against whom the attachment order was requested (hereinafter referred to as the "defendant") in the part of the case of the defendant and the person against whom the attachment order was requested (hereinafter referred to as the "defendant") suffered alcohol respect and depression for a long time, and even though they lack the ability to discern things or make decisions at the time of each crime of this case, the court below erred and adversely affected the judgment

Defendant

The Prosecutor's Sentencing 15 years of imprisonment) of the lower court's assertion of unreasonable sentencing is too unreasonable.

(A) On the contrary, the above sentencing by the court below is too unfortunate and unfair.

(A) It is unreasonable for the lower court to dismiss the request for attachment order even though it is highly probable that the Defendant committed murder again.

Judgment

As to the Defendant’s claim on the part of the Defendant’s case, the lower court also asserted the same as the grounds for appeal. According to the evidence duly admitted and examined, the lower court stated that the Defendant was hospitalized in order to cure the symptoms of alcohol dependence, stimulative disorder, and stimulative disorder, and that “the Defendant is deemed to have been in a state of mental disorder at the time of the instant crime,” but stated in the mental appraisal that “the symptoms reported by the Defendant are likely to be added to the symptoms of the use of alcohol, rather than the stimultive disorder,” and stated in the appraisal that “the symptoms reported by the Defendant are deemed to have been in a state of mental disorder at the time of the instant crime,” and stated in the investigation process only that “the Defendant did not make any statement as to the symptoms of his mental disorder at the time of the instant crime,” and (3) the Defendant stated in detail as to the part favorable to himself while not partially memory the specific form of assault against the victims, etc., and (4) the Defendant made a statement in detail.