logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2017.04.28 2016구합83129
출석정지처분 취소 청구
Text

1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff is a student who was enrolled in the fourth and fourth grade of the D Middle School in 2016.

B. On May 20, 2016, the Plaintiff thought that E, who is a teachers of Pyeongtaek-gu office, made an examination of a teacher in the Kakakao Kakao Kakao Kakao Kakao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Ka

C. On May 31, 2016, the D Middle School Guidance Committee (hereinafter “D Middle School Guidance Committee”) deliberated on the disciplinary action against the above teachers by mixing them with bathing in the same place as the Plaintiff, etc., and passed a resolution on two days of suspension of attendance against the Plaintiff.

On June 1, 2016, the Defendant issued a disposition to suspend the Plaintiff from attending (from June 7, 2016 to June 8, 2016) (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

E. The Defendant did not recognize the Plaintiff’s attendance during the period of suspension of attendance pursuant to the validity of the instant disposition and stated two days without permission in the Plaintiff’s school life records.

F. The Plaintiff dissatisfied with the instant disposition and filed an administrative appeal with the Seoul Metropolitan Office of Education Administrative Appeals, but the said administrative appeals commission dismissed the Plaintiff’s appeal on October 12, 2016.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 2, 3, 8, Eul evidence 1 to 6, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination on the defense prior to the merits

A. As to the plaintiff's lawsuit of this case seeking its revocation on the ground of illegality of the disposition of this case, the defendant asserts that the disposition of this case is unlawful since there is no legal interest to seek its revocation due to the completion of its execution.

B. 1) Determination 1) The instant disposition is based on the period of the relevant sanctions (from June 7, 2016 to June 8, 2016).

arrow