logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 논산지원 2015.04.10 2014고정115
상해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

around 22:40 on February 18, 2014, the Defendant returned to the victim E (the age of 49) under the influence of alcohol in the “D cafeteria operated by the Defendant in Seosan City” (hereinafter “D cafeteria”), but caused the victim to have a verbal dispute with the victim, which led to a number of times to the right eye of the victim due to drinking.

In the end, the Defendant, who was unable to know the number of days of treatment, was in a studio in which the victim was unable to know.

Summary of Evidence

1. The witness E’s statement fit for the aforementioned statement in this Court (the statement is consistent, specific, and after the date and time of the ruling, inconsistent with other evidence, such as F and G’s statement that E’s face was inconsistent with that of F and G’s statement that it was inconsistent with the previous conviction, and otherwise does not seem to have any circumstance to make the statement false, and thus, its credibility is recognized. The letter of request from the Healthy University Hospital cannot be readily concluded to have suffered injury on the same part as the date before January 22, 2014, which is the date and time before E’s decision, by itself, that the letter of request from the Healthy University Hospital cannot be readily concluded to have not been in the location of temporary injury as indicated in the

1. Statements made with the witness F in the third protocol of the trial, which fit the witness F;

1. Statements made in the fifth protocol of the trial in compliance with the witness G;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes that reflects the part and degree of the injury in the judgment, among E/Do photographs;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

2. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the confinement of a workhouse.

3. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow