The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the reasons for appeal (4 months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. A favorable circumstance is that the Defendant recognized the instant crime and reflects the fact that the Defendant appears to be suffering from a mental disease, and that the Defendant appears to have committed the instant crime by contingency.

However, the defendant has been punished four times due to the crime of violence (the punishment, the suspension of execution, and the punishment) and the degree of injury to the victim is relatively significant.

It seems that there is no agreement with the victim, and it seems that damage recovery measures have not been taken properly, etc. are disadvantageous.

In full view of the above circumstances and the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence, there is no special change in circumstances that make the sentence different from the original court’s sentencing conditions indicated in the records of this case, such as the circumstances after the crime, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.