logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2019.08.14 2019가단13632
물품대금
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 82,201,280 as well as the Plaintiff’s KRW 15% per annum from May 15, 2019 to May 31, 2019, and the following.

Reasons

1. The Plaintiff’s determination as to the cause of the claim supplied the Defendant with goods, such as LED lighting fixtures, to the Defendant around April and May 2018, and the fact that the Defendant did not pay KRW 82,201,280 out of the price for the said goods to the Plaintiff and delayed payment of KRW 82,201,280 does not conflict between the parties, or is recognized in accordance with the purport of the entry in

According to the above facts, the Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff the annual interest rate of 82,201,280 won and the amount that the original copy of the instant payment order from May 15, 2019 to May 31, 2019, which is clearly recorded as the next day after the original copy of the instant payment order was served to the Defendant; Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning Expedition, etc. of Legal Proceedings; Article 2(2) of the Addenda to the Regulations on Special Cases Concerning Expedition, etc. of Legal Proceedings (Presidential Decree No. 29768, May 21, 2019); Article 3(1)2 of the former Act on Special Cases Concerning Expedition, etc. of Legal Proceedings (amended by Presidential Decree No. 29768, May 21, 2019); Article 29(2)16 of the former Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings (amended by Presidential Decree No. 2971, Jun. 1, 20197).

2. The Defendant asserts that the Defendant’s claim against the Plaintiff for damages should be offset against the Plaintiff’s claim for damages since the Defendant suffered damages due to defective goods supplied by the Plaintiff.

However, the circumstances cited by the Defendant alone are to recognize that there exists a fundamental defect in the goods supplied by the Plaintiff to the Defendant.

arrow