logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2015.07.21 2014고단678
변호사법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant in violation of the Attorney-at-Law Act was accused of the extension of the building in E in the Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Do on August 2011 with C and D without permission, and the F, South Korea, was urged to receive entertainment expenses as a solicitation for the resolution of authorization and permission by taking advantage of the fact

Accordingly, the Defendant called D on August 201, 201, and called D, “it is not necessary to know about the fact that the wife is well aware of the public official, and is able to obtain the authorization through the public official. In order to obtain the authorization, the Defendant said that it is necessary to contact the public official, and that it is necessary to KRW 10 million for this purpose.”

On August 23, 201, the Defendant received KRW 2 million in total from D to D’s post office account (number:G) in the name of D as entertainment expenses, from D around August 23, 201, and KRW 10 million in total from September 7, 2011 to the post office account (number:G) under the same name.

Accordingly, the defendant received money and valuables in collusion with C on the pretext of solicitation for the affairs handled by public officials.

2. Around November 2012, the Defendant: (a) sought to lease the said building without permission, on the following grounds: (b) the Defendant was aware of the fact that the Defendant was able to possess the key to the instant 3rd floor E by requesting management, such as the prevention of winter and winterion, etc. from the victim’s residence in the Silung-si, the victim D’s residence; (c)

Accordingly, around March 2013, the Defendant conspired with C, and caused the wife H to enter the above building and reside therein, thereby infringing upon the victim’s residence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. Some statements in the suspect examination protocol of the defendant and C by the prosecution;

1. Entry of each part of the police interrogation protocol of the defendant, C, and H in the police interrogation protocol of the defendant, C, and H, and entry of D

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Court rulings, investigative reports (to hear statements from complainants and reference witnesses) and complaints;

arrow