logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.12.01 2016가합534250
조합원제명결의무효확인
Text

1. Of the instant lawsuit, the part of the Plaintiff’s claim for confirmation of membership is dismissed.

2. The Defendant dated April 7, 2016.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The parties 1) The Defendant is the Seoul Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Seoul Metropolitan Government 33,593 square meters in its rearrangement zone (hereinafter “instant rearrangement zone”).

(i)the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents (hereinafter referred to as the “Urban Improvement Act”) to implement housing reconstruction projects;

(2) The Plaintiff is the owner of the Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D land and its ground buildings (hereinafter “instant real estate”) located within the instant rearrangement zone and the person who was the Defendant’s member. The Plaintiff is the owner of the said land and its ground buildings located within the instant rearrangement zone and the Plaintiff was the head of Dongjak-gu, Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “instant real estate”).

B. The Defendant announced the relocation and the Plaintiff’s delay 1) on November 5, 2014, the period of relocation was determined and announced from November 20, 2014 to March 19, 2015, and around that time, the Defendant notified the Plaintiff and its members. 2) On December 31, 2014, the Defendant filed a lawsuit against the Plaintiff regarding the title of the building against the Plaintiff as Seoul Central District Court Decision 2014Ga5628, Seoul Central District Court Decision 2014Ga5628, and the said court accepted the Defendant’s claim on August 21, 2015. The Plaintiff appealed on the above judgment as Seoul Central District Court Decision 2015Na50179, and on December 16, 2015, “the Plaintiff withdraws the appeal of this case. The Defendant shall withdraw the India, and shall not be deemed to have given consent to the removal of the instant real estate after the delivery of the Plaintiff.”

(hereinafter “Related Building Name-Related Lawsuit”). Meanwhile, on January 2, 2015, the Defendant filed a lawsuit against the Plaintiff on January 2, 2015 against the Seoul Central District Court 2015Kahap50182 against the Plaintiff on September 1, 2014.

arrow