logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2020.06.09 2019나14158
구상금
Text

The main text of the judgment of the first instance shall be amended as follows:

The defendant is against the plaintiff 607,086 won and this.

Reasons

1. The Plaintiff is an insurer who has concluded each comprehensive motor vehicle insurance contract with respect to the vehicles E (hereinafter “Defendant”) owned by C (hereinafter “Plaintiff vehicles”).

On January 2, 2019, around 17:10, at Jeju, the G road located in F. G (hereinafter “instant road”) and H are driving the Plaintiff’s vehicle by turning the Plaintiff’s vehicle into one lane from the J apartment located in I High School to the two-lanes of the J apartment. While the Defendant’s vehicle is driving the two-lane of the same road, there was an accident that conflict between the front part of the Plaintiff’s vehicle and the rear side of the left side of the Defendant’s vehicle (hereinafter “instant accident”).

In the instant accident, the driver of the Plaintiff’s vehicle H and Dong passenger K suffered injuries, such as salt bars, tensions, etc., in need of two weeks’ medical treatment.

Part of the collision, the attitude of the collision, and the point of the collision are as shown in the drawings of the brief annexed hereto.

On February 18, 2019, the Plaintiff paid 338,490 won to H as medical expenses, and 336,050 won to K, respectively.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 6, 9, 10 evidence, Eul evidence 1 and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The driver of the Defendant’s vehicle’s main point of the Plaintiff’s assertion is the two-lanes of the instant road in which the left turn is prohibited, and the driver of the Plaintiff’s vehicle changed the course to the first way while trying to turn to the left, and the driver of the Plaintiff’s vehicle could not avoid the collision because it is impossible to predict the progress of the Defendant’s vehicle. Therefore, the fault ratio of the driver of the Defendant’s vehicle in relation to

Therefore, the defendant, who is the insurer of the defendant vehicle, should pay the plaintiff the total sum of the above insurance money paid by the plaintiff as the indemnity amount.

3. Where a driver of a related statute intends to make a left turn at the intersection, he/she shall go slowly along the median line of the road in advance;

arrow