1. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance regarding plaintiffs BB, CE, and CF shall be revoked, and each of the above plaintiffs' lawsuits shall be dismissed.

2...

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning this part of the underlying facts is that the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance is that of the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the dismissal or addition of each of the following items, and therefore, they are cited by the text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act

Part 2 and part 16 and 17 "A rehabilitation company, regardless of whether it was before or after the commencement of rehabilitation," "the rehabilitation company" was "the rehabilitation procedure and the rehabilitation plan approval order was issued, but was declared bankrupt thereafter; hereinafter "the bankruptcy company" regardless of whether it was before or after the commencement of rehabilitation; however, if it is necessary to distinguish it, it shall be classified into "the bankruptcy company before or after the division" as "the bankruptcy company after the division," and "the defendant C corporation (hereinafter "the defendant C")" as "the co-defendant corporation of the first instance trial (hereinafter "C")".

In Part 2, each "Rehabilitation Company" of not more than 19 shall be both "Bankruptcy Company", and each "Defendant C" shall be deemed "C".

Part 7 1 and 2 "A rehabilitation company that raises an objection and is currently pending in a lawsuit for objection" shall be added to the following part:

On March 27, 2015, the Seoul Central District Court 2013Gahap28204, the bankruptcy company raised an objection to the judgment in claim allowance proceedings, and as a result, the Seoul Central District Court 2011Kao1363 was sentenced to the judgment approving the judgment in claim allowance proceedings, and the main contents of the judgment are as follows.

① In the Seoul Central District Court Decision 2013Gahap28204, the notice of this case was indicated as “the notice of this case,” but the notice of this case was indicated as “the official document of this case” according to the first instance judgment.

The reason why C and the bankruptcy company agreed to refund 10% of the interest on the intermediate payment loan and the purchase price to the plaintiffs who are occupants, and then it is deemed that they are sent under the joint name.