logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2020.12.11 2020구단7263
출국명령처분취소
Text

1. The order of departure issued by the Defendant against the Plaintiff on July 11, 2019 shall be revoked.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On October 5, 201, the Plaintiff, a Chinese national, has been staying in Korea with the status of stay of overseas Koreans (F-4) on October 5, 201.

B. The Plaintiff, while engaging in urban bus and village bus driving service, committed a traffic accident with four people as follows (hereinafter “each of the instant traffic accidents”), resulting in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) by causing each traffic accident (the number in front shall be specified in the case of individual accidents) and entered into each of the following cases, and was issued a summary order of KRW 1 million for each time.

① On January 23, 2017, while driving an urban bus, the Plaintiff was guilty of committing a crime that caused an injury to the driver of a victimized vehicle for about two weeks in need of medical treatment by shocking the passenger car in the next lane while driving the urban bus, and was subject to a disposition that the prosecutor was not entitled to institute a prosecution on the ground that he/she purchased a comprehensive insurance policy.

② On January 25, 2017, while driving an urban bus, the Plaintiff entered the intersection by straightening in the right lane (six-lanes) at the right lane (five-lanes), and left directly from the right lane (five-lanes) of the truck that entered the intersection, was charged with the crime that the Plaintiff suffered an injury necessary for the above-day medical treatment of the driver of the truck who suffered an injury for about two weeks by shocking the left part of the Plaintiff’s bus. On February 23, 2017, the Plaintiff was subject to the prosecution’s disposition that he/she has no right to institute a prosecution on the ground that he/she had subscribed to the mutual aid association.

③ On November 20, 2017, while driving a village bus, the Plaintiff was guilty of having changed the lane from the two lanes to the three lanes on the three-lane road in one way in one way, resulting in the Plaintiff’s shocking of the three-lanes, causing injury to the driver in need of medical treatment for about three weeks, and was subject to the prosecution’s disposition on December 14, 2017.

④ The Plaintiff on January 2018

arrow